🔗

Index-only document

This document is listed as metadata with a link to its original source: the licence does not allow redistribution or we do not generate a preview. Consult the document on the source site.

Go to the original site ↗

Source: World Bank Open Knowledge Repository

Why don't we host this file?

The licence of this document does not allow us to redistribute copies. We list its verified metadata and link you to the official source, where the file is always up to date.

Guyana's Hinterland and Community-Based School Feeding Programme

World Bank, Washington, DC

🛡CC BY 3.0 IGOPermitted use with attribution

pages: 133
Format: PDF
Size: 3.2 MB
Views: 0
Downloads: 0

Source: World Bank Open Knowledge Repository ↗ · Report an issue

Shared byArjun Rao›

Abstract

Guyana s Hinterland Community-Based School Feeding Program (SFP) began in 2007 with the objective of building more community participation in schools and improving children s human development outcomes, such as student enrollment and attendance, nutritional status and learning outcomes. In addition, the program supports improvement of schools organization of primary level in Regions 1, 7, 8 and 9. In order to participate in the program, schools and their associated communities are required to submit school feeding proposals, undergo training in basic financial bookkeeping, food hygiene and nutritious meal preparation, using locally produced foods whenever possible. Communities must also ensure school kitchens meet the requirements and guidelines of the Ministry of Health, ensuring an adequate safe-water supply. To evaluate the program, the Government of Guyana and the World Bank collected survey data from schools, students, teachers and parents in three rounds 2007, 2008 and 2009 in Regions 1 and 7. This report shows the findings and impacts of SFP using all survey rounds. Regions 1 and 7 are characterized by high poverty levels and agricultural labor intensity. Both factors highlight the potential of organizing SFP around local producers, so that a regular supply of low-cost food can be guaranteed to the local schools and children living in precarious conditions. Seventeen of the sixty-four schools participating in the impact evaluation are in Region 7, and the rest are in Region 1. Randomization for the selection of comparison groups was not achieved, due to the participation rules. However, sample selection correction methods were used to correct for observable and unobservable biases.

Index-only document

Related documents

Amazon Sustainable Landscapes Program: Progress Report 2025

The Behavioral Professional

Cote d'Ivoire : Teacher Policies 2012

Toward New Sources of Competitiveness in Bangladesh

Improving the Quality of Financial Intermediation in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries

Ethiopia Public Expenditure Review