🔗

Index-only document

This document is listed as metadata with a link to its original source: the licence does not allow redistribution or we do not generate a preview. Consult the document on the source site.

Go to the original site ↗

Source: World Bank Open Knowledge Repository

Why don't we host this file?

The licence of this document does not allow us to redistribute copies. We list its verified metadata and link you to the official source, where the file is always up to date.

Peru : Impact of the Rural Roads Program on Democracy and Citizenship in Rural Areas

Washington, DC

🛡CC BY 3.0 IGOPermitted use with attribution

pages: 74
Format: PDF
Size: 687.1 KB
Views: 1
Downloads: 0

Source: World Bank Open Knowledge Repository ↗ · Report an issue

Shared byArjun Banerjee›

Abstract

The rural roads program, overseen by Provias Descentralizado (subdivision of Peru's Ministry of Transportation and Communications), began in 1995, and has received funds from the Peruvian Government, the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank. It is a national program for the rehabilitation and maintenance of roads that link rural communities and villages with secondary and principal roads, and through these, with towns and cities of the interior, thus expanding Peru's road network to the rural village level, especially in regions with greater levels of poverty. In its twelve years of existence, the program has been evaluated several times in terms of its impact on the economy (income levels, market dynamics), on gender equity, on the culture of the high Andes, on access to basic roads, and on rural living conditions (access to education, health, etc.). However, no effort had been made to systematically understand its impacts on democracy and the quality of citizenship exercised in rural areas. The study that is presented here, commissioned by the World Bank in February 2007, has sought to analyze PCR's impacts, using two general hypotheses that make it possible to explore the relationships between public roads and democracy. The first suggests that road integration, particularly the rehabilitation and maintenance of roads that link rural villages with district or provincial capitals, decreases the costs of democratic participation. In a context of increasing participatory supply, due to the ongoing recurrence of national and municipal electoral processes, as well as to the creation of new rights of participation, new roads allow rural residents to take part in democratic decision making processes without having to incur significantly higher costs than those of residents of urban centers. The second hypothesis is more specific to the Peru Rural Roads Program (PCR, for its Spanish acronym); it suggests that the way in which the program operates, its institutional arrangements and the institutions to which it provides its services, strengthens democracy, and local civil society, strengthens new leaders, improves local management skills, and aids in political inclusion, particularly that of more vulnerable sectors.

Index-only document

Related documents

Amazon Sustainable Landscapes Program: Progress Report 2025

The Behavioral Professional

Cote d'Ivoire : Teacher Policies 2012

Toward New Sources of Competitiveness in Bangladesh

Improving the Quality of Financial Intermediation in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries

Ethiopia Public Expenditure Review