Measuring Skills in Developing Countries — page 1

Page 1 of 82 · Preview

Measuring Skills in Developing Countries — page 2

Page 2 of 82 · Preview

Measuring Skills in Developing Countries — page 3

Page 3 of 82 · Preview

Measuring Skills in Developing Countries — page 4

Page 4 of 82 · Preview

Measuring Skills in Developing Countries — page 5

Page 5 of 82 · Preview

Measuring Skills in Developing Countries — page 6

🛡

You have reached the preview limit

The free preview includes the first 6 pages of 82. Download the original document to read the full content.

⬇ Download document

Page 6 of 82 · End of preview

The full document has 82 pages. Downloads happen on the original source site.

Measuring Skills in Developing Countries

World Bank, Washington, DC

🛡CC BY 3.0 IGOPermitted use with attribution

pages: 82
Format: PDF
Size: 6.3 MB
Views: 0
Downloads: 0

↗Will open at the source site: World Bank Open Knowledge Repository

Source: World Bank Open Knowledge Repository ↗ · Report an issue

Shared byAishwarya Sharma›

Abstract

Measures of cognitive, noncognitive, and technical skills are increasingly used in development economics to analyze the determinants of skill formation, the role of skills in economic decisions, or simply because they are potential confounders. Yet in most cases, these measures have only been validated in high-income countries. This paper tests the reliability and validity of some of the most commonly used skills measures in a rural developing context. A survey with a series of skills measurements was administered to more than 900 farmers in western Kenya, and the same questions were asked again after three weeks to test the reliability of the measures. To test predictive power, the study also collected information on agricultural practices and production during the four following seasons. The results show the cognitive skills measures are reliable and internally consistent, while technical skills are difficult to capture and very noisy. The evidence further suggests that measurement error in noncognitive skills is non-classical, as correlations between questions are driven in part by the answering patterns of the respondents and the phrasing of the questions. Addressing both random and systematic measurement error using common psychometric practices and repeated measures leads to improvements and clearer predictions, but does not address all concerns. The paper provides a cautionary tale for naïve interpretations of skill measures. It also points to the importance of addressing measurement challenges to establish the relationship of different skills with economic outcomes. Based on these findings, the paper derives guidelines for skill measurement and interpretation in similar contexts.

Related documents

Bangladesh Development Update, October 2026: Make Subsidies and Social Protection Work Better for the Poor

Estimating Extinction Threats with Species Occurrence Data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility

Did the 2018 Trade War Improve Job Opportunities for US Workers?

Money Demand in Venezuela : Multiple Cycle Extraction in a Cointegration Framework

High-Frequency Phone Survey (HFPS) - Phase 2

Regional Economic Integration in the Middle East and North Africa : Beyond Trade Reform