Washington, DC: World Bank
🛡CC BY-NC 3.0 IGOPermitted use with attribution
- pages
- 140
- Format
- PDF
- Size
- 4.2 MB
- Views
- 0
- Downloads
- 0
↗Will open at the source site: World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
Source: World Bank Open Knowledge Repository ↗ · Report an issue
Abstract
The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) is the Philippines’ flagship conditional cash transfer (CCT) program, designed to break the intergenerational cycle of poverty by promoting investments in human capital, particularly in health, education, and nutrition. The 4Ps beneficiaries are identified through Listahanan, a national targeting system that uses a proxy means test to determine poor households based on survey data. Eligible households must have a pregnant member or at least one child under 18 years old and agree to comply with program conditions. Beneficiaries are entitled to a 4Ps cash grant that is subject to education and health conditionalities, an additional first 100 days (F1KD) cash grant (introduced in 2025) for pregnant beneficiaries and those with children 0–2 years old to cover essential health and nutrition expenses, and automatic enrollment and coverage under the Philippine Health (PhilHealth) Insurance Program. Implemented since 2008, the 4Ps currently covers approximately 3 million families nationwide. The program is managed by the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD). The 4Ps seeks to improve the well-being of beneficiary families over time, particularly in terms of income, health, education, and socio-behavioral development. The program assumes that by enhancing these key dimensions of household well-being, beneficiaries and eventually their children will be empowered to sustain and build upon these gains. The 4Ps are designed to address specific constraints on human capital accumulation and access to essential services, rather than all determinants of poverty. Its effectiveness should therefore be assessed primarily by its contribution to improving education, health, and related outcomes among beneficiaries, while recognizing that broader poverty and employment outcomes also depend on complementary policies, institutions, and economic conditions.
